🔗 Share this article

In a significant legal reversal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that prevented viewers in Australia from seeing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an order issued at the request of the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Ban

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator applied to the review board to assess and rate the available footage. It first determined the content was "unable to be classified", a designation that empowered the regulator to instruct social media companies to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company filed an appeal for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the bystanders.

X argued the video was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, stating it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted extensive public discourse". X drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with different editing could have met that threshold. As a result, the panel revised the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

Some on the panel held a contrary view, contending the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the comparison to the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had subsided".

Response Following the Outcome

Posting on its global government affairs account, X expressed approval of the ruling.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about issues of public interest. We remain committed to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator acknowledged the board's decision, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material being displayed to Australians under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the regulator did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were distressing, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, platforms have been advised to use sensitive content labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on such content in line with their existing community guidelines.